One of my old readers is totally confused with my weather fetish. I was raised doing earthquakes, and was astounded at the crap way they do weather. This resulted in the whole climate change thing, done without physics and energy considerations. The earthquake equivalent is a prediction based on cloud formations.
The current weather forecasting is all about visible patterns. In the old days, all they had was a barometer and thermometer. Then they had maps, and went wild with them. We have the story of the weather and D-day.
Their main patterns are 'highs', 'lows' and the jet stream. Then they throw in phoney explanations like the polar vortex fairies. All done without energy calculations.
All physics in this area was destroyed when physics demolished the 'out of a hat' explanation of the ozone holes. No physics has been done since, and no Scientific Method has been allowed to counter the dogma that spouts from philosophical influencer lips. This has resulted in our 'generation without physics'. I make fun of that when they actually try to get something to work, like solar cells.
So, from earthquakes, I went to weather, and long-term forecasts. It's all energy.
All the weather in the world comes from this murky mess in the West Pacific.
The big ocean currents also modify the weather. Without the ocean heat energy, we would just have a stratified weather, like Jupiter. This 'hot spot' of weather is chaotic, meaning that there is some point that we can't penetrate to get a prediction, since predictions are all 'deterministic'. That's the difference between clockwork (deterministic) and musky's brain (chaotic).
Chaos is also an earthquake mechanism, but we can 'draw a box' around the chaotic part, and work with the mechanisms outside.
-- to be continued.
No comments:
Post a Comment