In general, this is what I expect to see. The Arctic will just have winds sweeping over it. We have a standard 70's repeat. Horrendous warmth starting on the long weekend.
ps it is obvious that if the stagnant heat moves in, they intend to call an 'El No-no".
They control all the definitions, so what the heck?
I remember when Bruke wanted to build a plant on Lake Erie. "The dang thing freezes solid in the winter." I said. It will never be built.
I was also looking at new nuclear sites just before the NDP destroyed Ontario. The only site was 'Bruce C', right in the middle of the place with no easy access to water.
I am not going to lip-flap this beyond my 3 readers, but the 'C' site has no physics. That's as far as I ever go. That forces the other side to look up what 'physics' means. Never happens. That rock is sponge cake. It's worse than Pick B with the settled ground making a giant bumper cars arena under the plant. None of this can be proven, because they would never look at something which would make them look bad.
With an impossible site, like the nuclear waste thing, they will spend a billion dollars, and then run away, quietly in the night. I will continue to snooze.
Finding news about the cold in Europe, is like pulling hen's teeth.
We just get this crap.
Spain guy has to wear a sweater!
