All the warmie news is on the BC bomb cyclone. It looks exactly the same as any other cyclone, but the added descriptor makes it a clange thing. We will soon hear that 'da bomb' is ten times more likely with clange.
Are you happy with the description? Do you go back to sleep with such compelling evidence for climate change? Do you want to dive into more details? What about the poor UK that is being hit with ice cycle weather? They are being left out in the cold media wilderness.
The poor UK is being hit with a linear Arctic outbreak. No clange, no media.
BC is being hit by the same thing, but a tropical plume got in the way.
You mix the two together, and it is a cyclone. The cold side of the equation is never mentioned.
Poor Toronto is just caught in a mucky mess.
Now, these guys are not claiming that the cold is ten times more likely with clange. There are limits.
No comments:
Post a Comment