One thing I just realized is that 'climate scientists' is just another School of Philosophy, or sophil. They are defined by group-think, so that to say there is a 'consensus' within the sophil, is a circular definition.
I'm looking forward to this. The first one was a big confusion of waffles. The sophils took out what they wanted, and made a lot of money. I expect this one will be worse. First thing though, is that they will redefine climate-change (clange) as extreme weather encompassing hot and cold.
What will never change is 'human-caused' because that meshes in with the 'humans are evil' sophil. Remember we had 30 years of this from bbc nature dramas. (The penguins! The penguins!). They are all fine, by the way, and the polar bears.
This is all wonderful for nasa as we drift farther and farther away from the original false assertion that we can have a 'greenhouse effect' in the atmosphere with our high Rayleigh Number.
In the meantime, all the big agencies are cutting down on their geophysics to support this meeting. Yeah.
ps. I have an image that they'll plop out a big dead whale on the bottom of the sea, and all the sophils will attack it and carve out what they want. :)
pps. if clange becomes all inclusive, then they will define it as an 'allergic reaction of the Earth to humans'. They don't have to stick to the laws of physics. Who cares?
more: the UK tabloids live on a hope and a prayer for a heatwave. I don't see it coming, just more cold air.
No comments:
Post a Comment