Article
Well, I blog for money and that's pretty sleazy, but my price is pretty low....
Anyway, the big thing about the article is that the science is pretty thin, and they are paying another hydro-geologist for an opinion. I don't think much of that, but I'm grouchy, and as the guy says, what do you expect me to say?
3 comments:
Novakowski stole your gig dude!
It ought a be u knocking down the six figure "independent" consultancy remuneration.
Am i wrong?
I don't suppose they'd be too happy with your conclusions regardless how correct they are.
Yes he did! But I couldn't take the acid!
I think it's a bit of an understatement when it says he 'worked' for OPG.
If he wants to have a study that never offends the unforgiving waste head of OPG, then he'll narrow the scope to meaningless-ness. In a dog's breakfast, you can always find a solid chunk! Why did OPG slip down the depth a few meters? Just do all the review on that chunk and you're rolling!
Post a Comment