This is my regular time when I go off the air, possibly forever, if I can actually do it. It's a time when I look over all my posts and realize I haven't done much. Things will be different in a year or two:
Bruce - they may start sinking a shaft into a cesspool
Chalk River - they will see if they can actually sink a borehole in that muck.
Injection earthquakes - expect many more as injection goes exponential.
Niagara Tunnel - they will be plastering over stress cracks in the lining.
Bye.
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
M3.3 in Manitoba-Sask
Ha! Just when we were joking about having a large earthquake in Manitoba-Sask!
This is all in Archean rock, which is well beyond my experience. The Montana seismic zone extends towards this earthquake. This is probably a 'frost quake', just like Chicago, and doesn't mean much.
This is all in Archean rock, which is well beyond my experience. The Montana seismic zone extends towards this earthquake. This is probably a 'frost quake', just like Chicago, and doesn't mean much.
New US seismotectonic model for nuclear plants
Reference
This isn't 'earth shattering'. It doesn't do any ground motion calculations. The news is all hyped up about this, but it's the same old stuff from many years past.
A utility would use this to come up with a ground motion, but then they would use the same old crufty seismic analysis. It's all rather sad......
This isn't 'earth shattering'. It doesn't do any ground motion calculations. The news is all hyped up about this, but it's the same old stuff from many years past.
A utility would use this to come up with a ground motion, but then they would use the same old crufty seismic analysis. It's all rather sad......
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

