So, let's ask the Artie about the Roman warm period and other such cycles.
The Roman Warm Period (RWP) was an era of unusually mild and stable temperatures that affected the European and North Atlantic regions from approximately 250 BCE to 400 CE. Contrary to older assumptions of a global event, current climate science indicates that these pre-industrial warm and cold phases were primarily regional climate anomalies, not globally synchronous "cycles".
Quite exciting, this warm cycle is 'deprecated' because of leftwinger warmism. Of course, all these warm and cold periods tend to be the northern hemisphere, where there is little evidence, and they can dismiss it by looking at Japanese records.
Still, they go on about the other cycles.
Dark Ages Cold Period (DACP) (c. 400–800 CE): A period of colder temperatures in many regions, which is hypothesized to have contributed to societal changes and migrations in Europe.
Medieval Warm Period (MWP) or Medieval Climate Anomaly (c. 800–1200 CE, with peak warmth around 950–1250 CE in the North Atlantic): Similar to the RWP, this was a regionally warm period, particularly in Europe, which facilitated Viking settlement in Greenland and increased crop yields. Again, this was not a globally uniform event.
Little Ice Age (LIA) (c. 1250–1850 CE): A subsequent period of significant regional cooling and glacier advance in North America and Europe, which saw harsh winters, crop failures, and famine.
These cycles seem to coincide with 'warm=happiness' and 'cold=dark ages'. Quite amazing. Of course, none of this has anything to do with today.
I find it sad that we are leaving a nice happy warm period. 'Of course, this is not a globally uniform event'.


















































