These are the comments about the process of the panel review for the DGR. It is exactly the same process currently being followed by the Bruce C dream. I don't know the schedule, but we should soon see a draft EIS which will be more fun than Bruce! Since this project is all about the geology, we should all expect a little more effort in this area (Ha, Ha!).
Some of the comments bitch about the CNSC taking total control of the panel review, making it a legal pseudo-licensing hearing. I don't really care, since I think its all courtroom stuff now, and I'm running like Hell! I'm off to the cottage now, where I can cool off my blogging fingers, and rest my troubled mind....
I hardly went through any of the comments, if somebody finds a jewel, let it be known!
4 comments:
This one is kinda scary.
I'm just browsing through the 'Interested Party' (anon) ones for now.
Ok. I had to look at this one.
Is it standard practice for a licensee to suggest how guidelines are written?
And these guys all line up at the hearings!
OPG wants to extend the scope of the hearings to allow them to descend into the muck, since the CNSC dominates this anyway. Other people in the comments are trashing this!
Post a Comment