This is fun, if it doesn't drop like a rock soon, then it's back to the drawing board, and my hypothesis is shattered. I thought I could predict the global temps by certain activity on the equator, but there may be other considerations.
RSS also shows a high August. Everybody is happy, since these ups and downs are all clange. The God Clange is a trickster.
The East Pacific is again showing one of my 'dry cyclones' This injects warm dry air into the top of the thick atmosphere, and they are more powerful than I thought.
The 10 km zone is also showing a rise, but I haven't been following it enough to be certain. Obviously, we need a global rise without the 10 km rise to make a hypothesis. A dry temperature rise doesn't have any energy to keep us warm. We will still have a horrendous winter with the Arctic spills coming over us, rather than Siberia.
A true El Nino is most likely a wet rise with lots of energy. Without any actual measurements, we flounder, and blame everything on the God Clange.
ps. Looking at MIMIC, we have a lot of cyclones all over the world, and this tends to spike the temps.
pps. I have nothing to lose, if my hypothesis crashes and burns. On to a new one! In the Scientific Method, I use a hypothesis to direct measurements. In the influencer world, nothing is done.
No comments:
Post a Comment