I got the big thick journal the other day. This is a really good one for me, filled with all the things I love: super shear rupture, stress disturbance, triggering, etc. I dislike the horrible complex calculations of ground motion, since I think they far beyond the true uncertainties.
I start with a great paper, which describes the world-wide stress disturbance of a giant earthquake. Anyone who has done discreet modeling with sliding blocks knows that perturbations go way farther than expected, because the whole thing is a non-linear mess! And so it is with the earth.
The basic hypothesis involves this fact and looks for seismicity changes following giant earthquakes. It found a significant effect, especially when you sort out areas that would become more unstable by the stress disturbance (some areas would become more stable).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eedd2/eedd2336258ad8debc3996c95953dc34767d0736" alt=""
They used past data to refine the method, but then did a brave thing. They have calculated the 'weather report' of earthquakes, disturbed by the giant M9 tsunami Sumatra quake.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89c61/89c61b84449df8a08ebd5a4fb76afc2bbea22317" alt=""
There is a good chance that all these red areas will be lit up like Christmas trees in the next few years. I haven't really checked whether China and Japan fit this, since you have to look at this stupid map with a magnifying glass, and there are multiple mechanisms within each zone.
So if you're wondering if there are a lot more earthquakes recently, maybe you're right! And maybe the Toronto area got a good whump, so crazy Harold will finally be vindicated! Muhaha!
2 comments:
Interesting article. Makes me go hmmm...
Me too! hmmmmmmm.
Post a Comment