Mixed feelings on this, as I worked on it heavily at one time, in the distant past, which I don't remember. I think they are fixing the intake, which was the most dangerous thing in the event of the 1 in 10000 earthquake. A nuclear plant should have no release of nuclear material at the 1 in 10 million odds, per year. If they are putting in an underground intake, then they read my stuff.
I found that the standard earthquake caused a huge release in my famous earthquake scenario, which nobody read, or cared about. The lefty loonies are against everything, and there is no 'neutral' body that cares about these things. The government bodies are under horrendous pressure. The press is horrible, bankrupt, and hobbled by having no information. The company sits comfortably on their rears and just pumps out garbage.
This is all wonderful, and completely normal for any country. Look at Japan! We can conclude that their problems were at 1 in 500, the return period of the big earthquake. Nobody cares about the 1 in 10,000 odds, let alone even more remote.
So, let's assume they are putting in an underground intake. Yeah! That only leaves my one tiny little thing about their foundation. They won't check it, so no problems exist by definition. It's a remote hypothesis, at 1 in 1000 of being correct. All could be proven by a 2-bit drilling (actually only one bit). They should have a lottery for checking one thing extra, and I know what I would pick, but I never buy lottery tickets. Someone else might care about clean floors, and they would win.
Please remember this is like Ozempic, with side effects. The alternative to not taking it, is dying early, so a little warped face isn't bad. With nuclear, the baby reactors aren't going to do much, and running out of power in an ice age isn't sweet. Ask Europe, where the natgas price has gone down because they rejoice that they will once again be dependent on a New Russia again.
No comments:
Post a Comment